Call to Action—2023
Operation Clean Sweep!
Though anyone, regardless of their qualifications, can run for the Office of President of the United States, the U.S. Constitution requires that: “No person except a natural born Citizen…of the United States…shall be eligible to the Office of President.”
Because the phrase “natural born Citizen” is not defined in the Constitution the meaning of the phrase comes both from the context of its English language usage and from the meaning of that term intended by the framers of the Constitution; which meaning, we will show below, is clear. Respectively, the English language usage of the proper noun “Citizen” is specific to the rights one has as a result of being: “a person who legally belongs in a country and is lawfully entitled to the rights and privileges of a freeman in that country, including but not limited to, the right to protection of that country.” The adjective phrase “natural born”, used by the Constitution’s framers to more particularly define the quality of the required citizenship, limits that quality to only those whose citizenship is defined by their “natural birth” as opposed to an operation of law. Respectively, the only form of citizenship that is so derived (as a matter of a person’s natural birth and not a matter of law) is the condition where both the child’s mother and father are citizens of the same country; because, if either parent is a citizen from a different country then the citizenship of the child is defined as a function of law and not by the natural birth of the child. Thus, as we look to the laws of nations at the time when the framers penned the Constitution, we find that the term “natural born Citizen” meant exactly that! Further, that meaning of the phrase “natural born Citizen” is the definition of that phrase as it is understood and applied in every nation throughout the entire world!
The phrase “natural born Citizen”:
- Was used in The Law of Nations, a book by, Emmerich de Vattel; that, according to the United States Supreme Court, was referenced in the Constitution (in Article I) and was a syllabus used to teach law at the colleges and law schools at the time the Constitution was written (Harvard, Yale and William & Mary’s);
- Was specifically defined in the statutes of Great Britain, France, etc. with words to the effect of: ‘A person born to parents both of whom are citizens of the same country’; and,
- Was referenced in the U.S. Statutes at Large, Ch. 3 § 1, which states: “…the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens … APPROVED, March 26, 1790.”
- Was specifically referred to in records of the time and letters between the framers of the Constitution and others and with the concern of avoiding foreign influences in the upbringing of anyone that would become President of this nation.
- Was mandated in the Constitution at: Art. II, § 1 Cl. 5; which was then used in the Courts to rule on many cases like:
- Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163, 165 (1964): “Congress has the right to legislate with respect to the general class…Congress here…was aiming only to regulate and…what Congress did had been deemed appropriate not only by this country but by many others and is in keeping with traditional American concepts of citizenship.
We start from the premise that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the "natural born" citizen is eligible to be President. Art. II, § 1.
…The constitution does not authorize Congress to enlarge or abridge those rights. The simple power of the national Legislature, is to prescribe a uniform rule of naturalization, and the exercise of this power exhausts it, so far as respects the individual." Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 827. And see Luria v. United States, 231 U.S. 9, 22; United States v. MacIntosh, 283 U.S. 605, 624; Knauer v. United States, 328 U.S. 654, 658.”
- Craig v. U.S. 340 F. App'x 471 (10th Cir. 2009): “We start from the premise that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the "natural born" citizen is eligible to be President. Art. II, § 1.”
- Hassan v. Colorado, 495 F. App'x 947 (10th Cir. 2012): “The magistrate judge heard the case on consent of the parties and eventually concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment did not affect the validity of Article II's distinction between natural-born and naturalized citizens.”
- Wherefore, because, none of the preceding articles, amendments, statutes, or cases have been reversed or overruled, the Constitution’s mandate that: "No Person except a natural born Citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of President.” Art. II, § 1; and,
Thus, the meaning of the phrase cannot be reasonably determined to define anything but, ‘A person naturally born to parents both of whom are citizens of the United States.’
Further, the 12th Amendment adds:
“But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that office of Vice-President of the United States.”
Because neither of Kamala Harris’s parents were citizens of the United States at the time of her birth, she can never be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States; which means, Congress is forbidden from ever seating her as a President or Vice President (regardless of the parties with whom she sleeps)—she simply cannot qualify!
So, what happens if Congress fails to do its constitutionally mandated duty. Of course, it is up to the people to hold Congress accountable.
It should also be clear that the government/Corp. U.S. officials are not following the Constitution on this matter; and, no action by them will be taken to enforce it.
The question most people seem to have at this point is: “What is the proper lawful action for people to take in this situation?”
The answer is limited by several factors; because no law limits anyone from running for office (even if they do not qualify to serve in said office), no legal action challenging a candidate’s capacity to serve in that office, brought before a respective election, can prevail against any such candidate. The only kind of action that could possibly prevail over a U.S. presidential election of someone that does not qualify for the office would be an action that challenged the President Elect, after the election and before the seating of such a President. However, the time for such an action is short; from election day until January 20. After a President is seated, they have the power to pardon; so, the remedy will not work then, unless the President is first charged with impeachment.
Therefore, the only way to lawfully challenge a President's lawful ability to serve once they are seated is by a Congressional Impeachment.
However, in the case of the 2020 election, given that every member of Congress failed to honor their respective oaths to support and defend the Constitution when they ① failed to vet the President and Vice President's qualifications to be seated and then ② seated Biden and Harris even though they did not lawfully qualify to be so seated. Therefore, every member of Congress that was seated in office prior to Noon, on January 20, 2021, is now subject to a Quo Warranto action.
And, given the fact that the only remedy to a Quo Warranto action is oustal from office, every member of Congress can now be replaced as a result of properly brought Quo Warranto action. Because the governors of each State have the power to seat any untimely vacancy in Congress, such an action would be, almost immediately, followed by gubernatorial appointments of congressmen to fill the vacant seats. Thus, the result of removing every member of Congress, via Quo Warranto, would be a clean sweep of Congress.
Given the fact that the prior Senate was completely removed for treasonously seating a President/Vice President that was not a natural born Citizen, can you imagine what the first act of the newly appointed Senate would be? We expect the new Senate’s first act would be, Impeachment of the interloping President/Vice President, for the very causes Congress should have used to keep the criminals out of the Executive offices with in the first place.
Respectively, we look at the events that have taken place since the Corp. U.S. 2020 Presidential (Popular) Election and notice things like: in less than a month Biden had made more Executive Orders than any other President did in their entire term of office; also, most of those orders had no basis in law and were made purely under the premise that he is a dictator ruling an Oligarchy (his idea, not ours); he has spent more money than any other President (counting his restoration of the China debt (owed in gold) that was terminated by President Trump to compensate for the China virus); he canceled treaties with Canada (the pipeline closure); restored federal support for abortions; his other economic policies are destroying the nation's economy if he is not stopped; he has opened the borders to the south; and, has brought us near to a nuclear war with North Korea; his fiasco pullout from Afghanistan. Even his once Democrat supporters are starting to turn away from him.
Therefore, the only way for the people to correct these injustices is learn how to learn the law and bring such Quo Warranto actions now! To complete a clean sweep of Congress; so, the new Congress can impeach Biden and Harris.
We have already prepared the paperwork to bring such actions in every Congressional District. Accordingly, we need people from every Congressional District across the United States to join the movement to hold Congress accountable to the law! That means, you need to spread the word! Direct everyone you can to this Call to Action.
At Team Law we have always helped people learn how to learn the law firsthand from its source. Accordingly, we are quite pleased to see that people are doing just that. Respectively, we hope people will awaken to that necessity.
We have also noted that we are concerned about the underlying reasons why the hidden controllers of Corp. U.S. seem to be doing everything in their power to inspire the people to rebel against Corp. U.S. and we see the effect of that underlying intent expressed in some of the State movements towards secession from the Union. Yet, when we have interviewed with some of the people strongly involved in those movements, we find that the people getting so involved are doing so not out of any sense of remedy; but, out of frustration. They have neither learned the law nor applied it; but, they got involved in the movement towards secession because they are so fed up with Corp. U.S. moving further and further away from our Constitution and laws that they just want out. Most of them have not actually thought through the effect of secession to realize that would only make everything worse and would likely end in civil war and disaster with far worse conditions than they already have (no food, no fuel, no funds, no rights, etc.). Most of them have simply lost hope and the secessionists have romanced them into the promise of change; but, they fail to notice the fact that those secessionist promoters have even less of a chance of honoring their promotions than they have that Clinton, Øbama, Biden or Harris will ever keep their promises.
Again, the only actual lawful and effective remedy any of us have is in learning and applying the law. And, when brought properly, there is nothing anyone can lawfully do to thwart the process of Quo Warranto; thus, it’s now time to spread the word! Send people to our Call to Action—2022 page or directly to our Home Page
Please, join us on our Conference Calls to either let us know how you can help or to discover how we can help you!
( top )
The following map is provided to help people find out which congressional district they live within. At this time this map is linked to the Corp. U.S. database such that the links below the map can help you find out who the Congressmen are that are currently the subject of the Call to Action—2021 “Operation Clean Sweep” that has the capacity of bringing Corp. U.S. back under constitutional control and saving our nation. These actions need to be brought this year! So, please tell everyone you know about “Operation Clean Sweep.”
You may contact us by way of our Open Forum with any support or inquiries.
( top )
All information on this site is provided for educational purposes only, with all rights reserved.
Use it at your own risk. Team Law never provides legal, financial or any other form of advice.
All materials on or available through this site are under Copyright © 1996-2013, and may not be reproduced,
except as noted, without the written consent of Team Law’s Trustee.